OSHA's Organizational Structure and Jurisdiction

OSHA Within the Department of Labor

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) operates as a division of the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL). This placement is significant because it positions workplace safety as a labor issue rather than a public health matter. As part of the DOL, OSHA is led by an Assistant Secretary of Labor who reports directly to the Secretary of Labor, a Cabinet-level position appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate.

This organizational arrangement means that OSHA's leadership, priorities, and enforcement emphasis may shift with presidential administrations. Construction industry supervisors should remain attentive to these potential shifts, as they can affect inspection priorities, regulatory interpretation, and enforcement activities. However, it's important to note that the fundamental requirements of the OSH Act and OSHA standards remain legally binding regardless of administrative changes.

The Department of Labor's Solicitor's Office provides legal support for OSHA, including representing the agency in contested citation cases before the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission and federal courts. Understanding this relationship is helpful for construction supervisors facing citation proceedings, as the Solicitor's attorneys, not OSHA compliance officers, ultimately handle litigation.

OSHA's Internal Structure

National Office

OSHA's national headquarters in Washington, D.C., establishes agency-wide policies, sets strategic goals, develops new standards, and coordinates federal enforcement activities. Key components of the national office include:

  1. Office of the Assistant Secretary: Provides overall leadership and establishes agency priorities and policies.
  2. Directorate of Construction: Particularly relevant to construction supervisors, this office develops construction-specific safety and health standards and provides technical assistance on construction safety and health issues. This directorate also analyzes inspection data to identify emerging hazards in the construction industry and develops emphasis programs targeting high-hazard construction activities.
  3. Directorate of Standards and Guidance: Develops and revises safety and health standards and provides guidance on complying with the standards.
  4. Directorate of Enforcement Programs: Establishes enforcement policies and oversees the field enforcement operations.
  5. Directorate of Technical Support and Emergency Management: Provides technical expertise and support to field offices and develops emergency response procedures.
  6. Directorate of Cooperative and State Programs: Manages OSHA's various cooperative programs and coordinates with State Plan states.
  7. Directorate of Training and Education: Oversees the OSHA Training Institute and education programs.
  8. Directorate of Administrative Programs: Manages OSHA's administrative functions, including budgeting and human resources.

Regional and Area Offices

OSHA divides its field operations into ten geographical regions, each led by a Regional Administrator:

  • Region I: Boston (CT, MA, ME, NH, RI, VT)
  • Region II: New York (NJ, NY, PR, VI)
  • Region III: Philadelphia (DC, DE, MD, PA, VA, WV)
  • Region IV: Atlanta (AL, FL, GA, KY, MS, NC, SC, TN)
  • Region V: Chicago (IL, IN, MI, MN, OH, WI)
  • Region VI: Dallas (AR, LA, NM, OK, TX)
  • Region VII: Kansas City (IA, KS, MO, NE)
  • Region VIII: Denver (CO, MT, ND, SD, UT, WY)
  • Region IX: San Francisco (AZ, CA, HI, NV, Pacific Islands)
  • Region X: Seattle (AK, ID, OR, WA)

Within each region, multiple area offices handle day-to-day enforcement activities. These area offices are staffed with compliance officers who conduct workplace inspections, investigate complaints and incidents, and issue citations for violations. Construction supervisors should be familiar with their local OSHA area office, as this is the entity they will most directly interact with during inspections, complaint investigations, and compliance assistance activities.

OSHA Consultation Program

Separate from enforcement activities, OSHA funds on-site consultation programs that provide free, confidential safety and health advice to small businesses. These consultation services are typically administered by state agencies or universities and operate independently from OSHA's enforcement branches.

For small and medium-sized construction companies, this separation is crucial to understand—consultants cannot issue citations or penalties, and they are prohibited from routinely sharing specific information about workplace conditions with enforcement personnel. This "firewall" between consultation and enforcement encourages employers to seek assistance without fear of triggering inspections.

Federal and State Jurisdiction

Federal OSHA Coverage

Federal OSHA has jurisdiction over workplace safety and health in:

  • All private sector workplaces in states without OSHA-approved state plans
  • Federal government agencies (though it cannot assess penalties against other federal agencies)
  • The U.S. Postal Service
  • Private sector employers in federal enclaves within state plan states (like military bases)
  • Certain maritime operations regardless of state plan status

State Plan Programs

Under Section 18 of the OSH Act, states can develop and operate their own workplace safety and health programs. These State Plans must be approved by OSHA and must be "at least as effective as" the federal program. This means State Plans may have more stringent requirements than federal OSHA, but never less.

Currently, 22 states and territories operate complete State Plans covering both private sector and state/local government workers:

  • Alaska
  • Arizona
  • California
  • Hawaii
  • Indiana
  • Iowa
  • Kentucky
  • Maryland
  • Michigan
  • Minnesota
  • Nevada
  • New Mexico
  • North Carolina
  • Oregon
  • Puerto Rico
  • South Carolina
  • Tennessee
  • Utah
  • Vermont
  • Virgin Islands
  • Virginia
  • Washington
  • Wyoming

Six additional states and territories operate partial State Plans covering only state and local government workers:

  • Connecticut
  • Illinois
  • Maine
  • New Jersey
  • New York
  • U.S. Virgin Islands

For construction supervisors operating in multiple states, understanding the jurisdictional differences is critical. For example, California's Cal/OSHA program has numerous requirements that exceed federal standards, including more stringent fall protection requirements, heat illness prevention measures, and unique crane certification requirements.

State Plans receive up to 50% of their funding from OSHA and must undergo regular federal monitoring and evaluation to ensure they remain at least as effective as federal OSHA. States may lose their approval if they fail to maintain program effectiveness.

Jurisdictional Challenges in Construction

The construction industry frequently faces unique jurisdictional questions due to:

  1. Multi-state operations: Large construction companies often work across state lines, requiring compliance with different state plan requirements.
  2. Federal contracts and facilities: Construction on federal property may fall under federal OSHA jurisdiction even within a state plan state.
  3. Public works projects: State and local government construction projects may have different requirements than private sector projects in the same state.
  4. Tribal lands: Native American reservations present special jurisdictional questions, often depending on specific treaties and laws.

When jurisdictional questions arise, construction supervisors should consult with safety professionals or legal counsel familiar with the specific circumstances. In some cases, OSHA and state agencies have formal or informal agreements addressing overlapping jurisdiction.

Coverage Exemptions and Limitations

While OSHA's authority is broad, certain workplaces and conditions fall outside its jurisdiction:

Statutory Exemptions

The OSH Act specifically exempts:

  • Self-employed persons
  • Farms that employ only immediate family members of the farmer
  • Workplaces regulated by other federal agencies under different statutes when those regulations address workplace safety and health

Other Federal Agency Jurisdiction

Several other federal agencies have statutory authority over workplace safety in specific industries or settings:

  1. Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA): Regulates safety and health in mining operations, including surface construction at mine sites.
  2. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA): Has jurisdiction over aircraft operation safety, though OSHA retains authority over other workplace hazards affecting aviation workers.
  3. Coast Guard: Regulates maritime safety on vessels, though OSHA maintains jurisdiction over certain longshoring and shipyard activities.
  4. Department of Energy (DOE): Regulates worker safety at certain nuclear facilities and weapons production sites.

The construction industry occasionally experiences jurisdictional overlaps with these agencies. For example, construction work at active mine sites typically falls under MSHA rather than OSHA jurisdiction, while construction at DOE nuclear facilities may fall under DOE safety requirements. These distinctions matter because the standards, inspection procedures, and penalties may differ significantly between agencies.

OSHA's Relationship with Other Safety Organizations

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)

NIOSH serves as the research arm for occupational safety and health. Created alongside OSHA by the OSH Act, NIOSH operates as part of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention within the Department of Health and Human Services, not the Department of Labor.

NIOSH:

  • Conducts research on workplace hazards and exposures
  • Investigates potentially hazardous working conditions when requested
  • Makes recommendations for new OSHA standards and policies
  • Provides education and training in occupational safety and health
  • Tests and certifies respiratory and other personal protective equipment

For construction supervisors, NIOSH publications often provide valuable technical information and practical solutions that exceed what's available in OSHA's formal guidance. NIOSH's research frequently forms the scientific basis for new or revised OSHA construction standards.

Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC)

The OSHRC is an independent federal agency separate from OSHA that adjudicates disputes between OSHA and employers regarding citations, penalties, and abatement periods. When an employer contests an OSHA citation, the case goes before an OSHRC administrative law judge and potentially to the full three-member Commission.

The separation between OSHA (which issues citations) and OSHRC (which adjudicates contested citations) provides an important check on OSHA's enforcement authority. Construction supervisors should understand that OSHRC decisions may establish precedents affecting how standards are interpreted and applied, creating a body of case law that supplements the written regulations.

Standards Development Organizations

OSHA frequently incorporates consensus standards developed by organizations such as:

  • American National Standards Institute (ANSI)
  • American Society of Safety Professionals (ASSP)
  • National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)
  • American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)

These incorporated standards become legally enforceable requirements through a process called "incorporation by reference." Construction supervisors should be aware that complying with OSHA standards sometimes requires following these incorporated consensus standards, even though they weren't directly written by OSHA.

OSHA's Authority and Limitations

Inspection Authority

OSHA has broad authority to enter and inspect workplaces during regular working hours and at other reasonable times. This authority has been upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court, though OSHA generally cannot conduct non-consensual inspections without a warrant if an employer refuses entry.

In construction, OSHA's inspection authority extends to all areas of a worksite where work is being performed, including:

  • Temporary offices and trailers
  • Material storage areas
  • Equipment staging areas
  • All active construction zones
  • Employee gathering areas
  • Temporary housing facilities provided by employers

OSHA compliance officers can observe work practices, interview employees privately, review required records, take photographs and videos, collect samples, and monitor employee exposure to hazards.

Enforcement Limitations

Despite its broad authority, OSHA faces several significant limitations:

  1. Resources: With approximately 1,850 inspectors (federal and state combined) responsible for 8 million workplaces nationwide, OSHA can inspect only a small fraction of workplaces each year. This makes targeted and strategic enforcement essential.
  2. Small Employer Exemptions: Employers with 10 or fewer employees are exempt from programmed inspections in certain low-hazard industries, though the construction industry is not considered low-hazard.
  3. Rulemaking Constraints: OSHA must follow the Administrative Procedure Act when developing new standards, a process that often takes years and allows for legal challenges that can further delay implementation.
  4. Budget Restrictions: Congressional appropriations determine OSHA's budget, affecting its ability to hire compliance officers, conduct inspections, and develop new standards.
  5. Statutory Penalty Caps: While penalties have increased in recent years, they remain relatively modest compared to those of some other regulatory agencies, particularly for non-willful violations.

Cooperative Programs

Recognizing its limited resources, OSHA has developed several cooperative programs that extend its reach through voluntary participation:

  1. Voluntary Protection Programs (VPP): Recognizes employers with exemplary safety and health management systems who maintain injury rates below their industry averages. VPP participants are exempt from programmed inspections.
  2. Strategic Partnership Program: Forms cooperative relationships with groups of employers, workers, and other stakeholders to address specific safety and health issues.
  3. Alliance Program: Collaborates with trade associations, labor organizations, and educational institutions to develop compliance assistance resources and training.
  4. Safety and Health Achievement Recognition Program (SHARP): Recognizes small and medium-sized employers who operate exemplary safety and health programs.

Construction companies participating in these programs often experience fewer injuries, lower workers' compensation costs, and reduced OSHA scrutiny, though they must demonstrate ongoing commitment to exceeding minimum compliance requirements.

OSHA's Construction-Specific Oversight

The construction industry receives specialized attention from OSHA due to its high hazard nature and unique workplace characteristics. This focus manifests in several ways:

Directorate of Construction

As mentioned earlier, OSHA maintains a specialized Directorate of Construction at its national headquarters, staffed with engineers, safety professionals, and standards specialists with construction industry expertise. This directorate develops construction-specific standards, interpretations, and compliance guidance.

Construction-Specific Standards

Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 1926, contains construction-specific standards that address the unique hazards of construction work. These standards are generally more detailed and prescriptive than the general industry standards in 29 CFR 1910, reflecting the higher-risk nature of construction activities.

Special Emphasis Programs

OSHA periodically implements National Emphasis Programs (NEPs) and Local Emphasis Programs (LEPs) targeting specific construction hazards or activities, such as:

  • Trenching and excavation
  • Fall hazards
  • Struck-by hazards
  • Silica exposure
  • Work zone safety

These programs direct additional inspection resources to high-hazard activities and often include outreach and education components alongside enhanced enforcement.

Construction Targeting Systems

OSHA uses several systems to target high-hazard construction sites for inspection:

  • Site-Specific Targeting based on reported injury rates
  • Dodge Reports and other construction data services to identify active projects
  • Plain-view observations of apparent violations
  • Local knowledge of high-hazard activities

Construction supervisors should understand that highly visible projects, particularly those involving hazardous activities like roofing, structural steel erection, or excavation, have a higher likelihood of OSHA inspection.

Implications for Construction Supervisors

Understanding OSHA's structure and jurisdiction has several practical implications for construction supervisors:

Strategic Compliance

Knowing OSHA's priorities, emphasis programs, and targeting strategies allows supervisors to allocate safety resources strategically, focusing on areas most likely to attract OSHA attention and cause serious injuries.

Inspection Preparedness

Familiarity with OSHA's area offices, inspection procedures, and authority prepares supervisors to manage inspections professionally and effectively, potentially leading to better outcomes.

Appropriate Appeals

Understanding OSHRC's role in the citation appeal process helps supervisors make informed decisions about contesting citations and the likelihood of success.

Resource Utilization

Knowledge of OSHA's various non-enforcement resources, including consultation services, cooperative programs, and technical assistance, allows supervisors to leverage these resources to improve safety performance.

Multi-Jurisdictional Compliance

For companies working across multiple states or jurisdictions, understanding the variations in regulatory requirements enables efficient development of compliant safety programs.

By developing a comprehensive understanding of OSHA's organizational structure and jurisdictional authority, construction supervisors can navigate the regulatory landscape more effectively, protecting both their workers and their companies from the consequences of non-compliance.


Was this article helpful?